How to find LinkedIn post examples that actually performed.
A useful example is more than a polished piece of copy. It has a verifiable source, an identifiable author, a publication date, a format, and performance signals that can be compared with other posts in the same topic. This finder keeps that context attached to every result.
Curly collects the current public ranking for the topic when you run the tool. That does not mean every ranked post was published recently: strong older posts may remain visible in a topic collection. Check the publication date or choose Newest first when recency is part of the research question.
- 01
Choose a topic that matches your audience
Select one of the available professional topics, such as marketing, sales, artificial intelligence, leadership, or recruitment and HR. A focused topic makes comparisons more useful than a mixed feed.
- 02
Choose the performance signal
Use total engagement for a broad view, reactions for reach and resonance, comments for discussion, newest for publication date, or LinkedIn ranking to preserve the order shown in the source topic collection.
- 03
Read the post before copying the pattern
Open each original post and compare its hook, format, evidence, tone, and call to action. The engagement number alone does not explain why a post worked or whether its approach fits your audience.
- 04
Export the examples you want to analyze
Download JSON for code and automation or CSV for a spreadsheet. Keep the post URL, author, publication date, ranking, and engagement fields attached so the examples remain verifiable.
Real post examples are different from templates.
A template suggests a structure such as a list, story, lesson, or contrarian opinion. A real post shows how one author used a structure in a particular context and how readers responded. The example can reveal pacing, line length, specificity, media format, and the relationship between the hook and the rest of the post.
When collecting LinkedIn post ideas, treat each result as evidence of one execution rather than a formula. Do not copy a post or assume its result transfers to another account. Use multiple examples to form a hypothesis, then write an original version grounded in your experience, evidence, and audience. This produces more useful research and avoids turning a source post into a reusable script.
Choose the right ranking for the question.
Engagement signals answer different questions. Select the metric before reviewing the results so a large reaction count does not distract from the behavior you actually want to understand.
| Sort option | Best used for | What to check |
|---|---|---|
| Highest total engagement | Find posts with the strongest combined reaction, comment, and repost count. | Large totals can reflect an author’s audience size as much as the post format. |
| Most reactions | Study topics and hooks that earned a lightweight response from many readers. | A reaction does not necessarily indicate a detailed conversation or buying intent. |
| Most comments | Find examples that triggered questions, debate, or community participation. | Read the comments because disagreement and support produce the same count. |
| Newest first | Prioritize the most recently published examples available in the topic result. | Newer posts may not have had enough time to accumulate engagement. |
| LinkedIn ranking | Keep the topic order recorded by the source instead of sorting again by one metric. | The ranking is a snapshot and does not guarantee that the post itself is new. |
Which LinkedIn topics can you explore?
The searchable picker currently includes 60 options: broad professional categories, selected subtopics, and a snapshot of LinkedIn trending topics. Search for subjects such as marketing, sales, leadership, artificial intelligence, workplace trends, or content quality instead of scrolling through the complete list.
Topic collections change over time, and LinkedIn can expose additional deeply nested subjects that are not in this curated picker. Use the free finder for the maintained selection. If you already know another public Top Content URL or topic path, the bulk Apify scraper can accept it directly.
How to evaluate viral LinkedIn posts beyond the engagement count.
Use performance as a filter that identifies posts worth closer inspection. Then compare the creative decisions and the context around them. A large number does not prove that a post was broadly viral or that its format will transfer to your account. A high-performing post from a large creator may be a poor benchmark for a new company page, while a lower-volume example can contain a format that fits a specialist audience.
- Compare the first two lines because the hook determines what readers see before expanding a post.
- Separate the topic from the format: a carousel, text post, image, or article may perform differently even when the subject is similar.
- Check the publication date and author context before treating a high count as a current benchmark.
- Use several examples to identify repeated structures; one viral post is an anecdote, not a reliable content strategy.
- Save the original URL and verify the post before quoting, republishing, or using it in client work.
Export the evidence behind each example.
JSON preserves nested author and media data for code or automation. CSV flattens the key fields for sorting, annotation, and comparison in a spreadsheet. Both formats include the original post URL, text, author, publication date, topic, ranking, reaction count, comment count, repost count, and collection time when those values are publicly available.
Keep published_at and scraped_at separate. The first tells you when the author published the post; the second tells you when Curly collected the public ranking. This prevents an older post found today from being mistaken for a newly published post.
{
"topic_title": "Marketing",
"topic_rank": 1,
"post_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/...",
"author": { "name": "Example Author" },
"text": "A real public post...",
"published_at": "2026-07-30",
"reaction_count": 1240,
"comment_count": 86,
"repost_count": 12,
"scraped_at": "2026-08-06T10:30:00.000Z"
}Free example finder versus the bulk Apify scraper.
Use the free page for a quick review of one topic. Use the LinkedIn Top Content Scraper on Apify when your content workflow needs several topics, repeatable collections, larger combined datasets, schedules, or webhooks.
| Capability | Free finder | Apify scraper |
|---|---|---|
| Topics per run | One topic | Up to 100 topics |
| Results | Up to 10 posts | Up to 10 per topic |
| Sorting | Five ranking options | Five ranking options |
| JSON and CSV | Manual download | Datasets and exports |
| Schedules and integrations | Not included | Schedules, webhooks, and integrations |